Here’s an interesting twist on beer ingredients. Apparently New Zealand's Parliament is debating whether the definition of beer should include hops. This from Nelson Mail:
The brewing industry is hopping mad at a proposed law change that would have changed the definition of beer to no longer require hops.
"I was flabbergasted," said New Zealand Hops chief executive Doug Donelan in Nelson when he learnt of the amendment to the Alcohol Reform Bill which is being debated by Parliament through the committee stages.
Nelson MP Nick Smith came to the rescue yesterday, telling Justice Minister Judith Collins hops needed to be retained in the legal definition of beer.
He said he had been inundated with messages from brewers, beer drinkers and hop growers who were aghast that the definition of beer was to be watered down.
Dr Smith, an amateur home brewer, said: "Beer without hops is sacrilege. It would be like having wine made without grapes or cheese without milk."
The proposal to water down the definition of beer came from officials wanting a less prescriptive definition for beer in case new products were developed without hops, he said.
.
0 comments (click to read or post):
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment...I do moderate each comment so it may not appear immediately...and please be nice! You can also comment using Disqus (below) or even comment directly on Facebook (bottom).