that was the label that I got in on the fun with. Sam K, this label was around in the mid 80's, not the horse label (although I dont know if it immediately followed it).
I remember it well, both with the foil around the top (not a good idea) and with just a paper neck label. either way, the beer was GOOOD.
I still have old boxes i cant seem to part with. they have a 95 and 96 stamp on them.
Yeah, Lee, I'm pretty sure this one followed the horse directly. To your recollection, did this label mark the change from the licorice-tinged expression? I remember the gold foil, too!
That gold foil was used on the 1857 line for some time, including 1857 Dry and 1857 Light, which came with the porter (I think) in a sampler case.
I also recall that the 1857 recipe changed (not for the better as with the porter, though) with the move from green to brown glass, so perhaps a recipe change is a good reason to re-package the product, as well.
You are right on the mixed case, Sam. I bought a lot of those cases until I realized I was not interested in a quarter of them (the light).
This label is when I started drinking steg porte, so I cant compare to the horse predecessor. This one was signficantly different from the current one though, had a molasses/brown sugar flavor that was fantastic, and distinctive. Also a hint of licorice but probably not even comparable to the amount in the 70's version.
Craft Brewers, Beer-bar owners, Craft Beer Distributors, Breweries & Six-Pack/Bottle Shops...Join our FREE service now. See our FAQ page or e-Mail me for details.
We're always looking for reporters and guest writers. Whether it's as simple as reporting the current tap list and new bottles at your favorite beer-bar or writing a guest-writer beer-article from a great beer location...please e-Mail me for details and submissions.
Disclaimer
Anyone viewing this page MUST be 21-years of age or older.
We've added some tools to encourage interaction. First and foremost, you'll see the Recent Comments section up above. This list displays the most recent comments from individual posts. Feel free to comment on ANY post by clicking on the "comments" link at the bottom of any post, or any link in the Recent Comments section. Comments are moderated, however you can choose to post anonymously.
Please also remember mybeerbuzz is very active on Facebook & Twitter and we DO support RSS feeds for posts and comments.
mybeerbuzz.com is not affiliated with any of the advertisers shown above. We run Ads as a way to help offset the costs to run this FREE blog....BUT if you do happen to click on any of these ads (even if you don't buy), we do eventually get a few pennies....literally.
4 comments (click to read or post):
that was the label that I got in on the fun with. Sam K, this label was around in the mid 80's, not the horse label (although I dont know if it immediately followed it).
I remember it well, both with the foil around the top (not a good idea) and with just a paper neck label. either way, the beer was GOOOD.
I still have old boxes i cant seem to part with. they have a 95 and 96 stamp on them.
This is a nice looking label.
Yeah, Lee, I'm pretty sure this one followed the horse directly. To your recollection, did this label mark the change from the licorice-tinged expression? I remember the gold foil, too!
That gold foil was used on the 1857 line for some time, including 1857 Dry and 1857 Light, which came with the porter (I think) in a sampler case.
I also recall that the 1857 recipe changed (not for the better as with the porter, though) with the move from green to brown glass, so perhaps a recipe change is a good reason to re-package the product, as well.
You are right on the mixed case, Sam. I bought a lot of those cases until I realized I was not interested in a quarter of them (the light).
This label is when I started drinking steg porte, so I cant compare to the horse predecessor. This one was signficantly different from the current one though, had a molasses/brown sugar flavor that was fantastic, and distinctive. Also a hint of licorice but probably not even comparable to the amount in the 70's version.
Post a Comment