Bells Brewery Sues Classic Wines Ltd. Distributor

14 May 2009

Here's a little beer tidbit to follow as it progresses:

Bell's Brewery Files suit against Classic Wines in Lansing

Bell's Brewery has filed a lawsuit in Kalamazoo County Circuit Court against its Lansing-based distributor, Classic Wines Ltd., seeking to stop the sale of distribution rights.

Classic Wines is trying to sell its distribution rights to M&M Distributors Inc., which is also an Anheuser-Busch InBev distributor, according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that M&M's loyalties to A-B will not allow M&M to fairly promote and sell Bell's brands. Bell's, the largest beer producer in the state, refuses to consent to the proposal by Classic Wines to sell the distribution rights because it "does not meet the material and reasonable qualifications and standards required by Bell's."

The eight-page complaint addresses Anheuser-Busch's control of the U.S. beer market and its efforts to "stifle competition" from other Big Beer companies and craft brewers.

Classic Wines is the fourth-largest distributor of Bell's in the state, selling about 55,000 cases a year, Bell's president Larry Bell said. Sixty-five percent of Classic Wines sales are of Bell's brands, according to the lawsuit.

Bell's pulled out of Chicago in December 2006, after a public dispute with its distributor, Indianapolis-based National Wine & Spirits Inc., which sold distribution rights to another distributor, Chicago Beverage Systems. Just last July, a new distributor for Bell's was found, allowing the brand to be sold in Chicago for the first time in almost two years.

3 comments (click to read or post):

tazio 14 May, 2009 12:38  

Seems like Bell's didn't have something in their contract to the effect that distribution rights were non-assignable. In a way, I like something about the mystery of the beer distributorship, as it harkens back to another earlier and better time, but it can leave consumers wishing for more in some cases.

mybeerbuzz,  14 May, 2009 13:03  

It would be ashame if InBev/AB owned the distribution rights to Bells beers. Seems like a tremendous conflict of interest to me. I'd bet Bells had no idea how large they may get back when they signed that contract.

Post a Comment

Please leave a comment...I do moderate them so it may not immediately appear...and please be nice!

WILK Friday BeerBuzz

2016 NEPA BlogCon Winner

2016 NEPA BlogCon Winner

Lets Talk Beer!

We've added some tools to encourage interaction. First and foremost, you'll see the Recent Comments section up above. This list displays the most recent comments from individual posts. Feel free to comment on ANY post by clicking on the "comments" link at the bottom of any post, or any link in the Recent Comments section. Comments are moderated, however you can choose to post anonymously.

Please also remember mybeerbuzz is very active on Facebook & Twitter and we DO support RSS feeds for posts and comments.

Advertising is not affiliated with any of the advertisers shown above. We run Ads as a way to help offset the costs to run this FREE blog....BUT if you do happen to click on any of these ads (even if you don't buy), we do eventually get a few pennies....literally.
Creative Commons License by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at

  © Copyright 2016

Back to TOP